Discussion:
OLSRv1 VS OLSRv2
Syed Salman Haider Rizvi
2013-11-27 08:59:38 UTC
Permalink
Hi All ,
I m doing performance evaluation for multi hop ETT vs ETX for ETT i m using using olsrv2 and for etx i m using olsrv1 . because i m not able to use olsrv2 for etx due to plugin compiling problem for my etx . will there be any difference due to different packet of olsr1 vs olsr2 or the packet is same for both versions ???

Thanks
Henning Rogge
2013-11-27 09:12:44 UTC
Permalink
If you compile the OLSRv2 code without the "nl80211-listener" plugin,
ETT will behave like ETX (because it cannot detect the link speed).

Run "ccmake .." within the build directory and change the variable
OONF_CUSTOM_STATIC_PLUGINS to the list of plugins you need.

If the variable is empty, you get the following list:
"cfgparser_compact cfgio_file ff_ett neighbor_probing nl80211_listener
eth_listener auto_ll4"

You can leave out "neighbor_probing", "nl80211_listener",
"eth_listener" and "auto_ll4" for your ETX experiment.

Henning Rogge

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Syed Salman Haider Rizvi
<***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All ,
>
> I m doing performance evaluation for multi hop ETT vs ETX for ETT i
> m using using olsrv2 and for etx i m using olsrv1 . because i m not able to
> use olsrv2 for etx due to plugin compiling problem for my etx . will there
> be any difference due to different packet of olsr1 vs olsr2 or the packet is
> same for both versions ???
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> Olsr-users mailing list
> Olsr-***@lists.olsr.org
> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users



--
We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered
long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan

--
Olsr-users mailing list
Olsr-***@lists.olsr.org
https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
Syed Salman Haider Rizvi
2013-12-09 11:03:46 UTC
Permalink
Sorry for the late response i had successfully compiled olsrv2 with these plugins ("neighbor_probing", "nl80211_listener","eth_listener" and "auto_ll4" ) so i will be able to use etx and ett with these plugins ? Also when i select these plugins in make menuconfig i get errors (OpenWrt) . So if I'm on right side just let me know which parameters will work for ETT and so on for ETX ?
Salman

> From: ***@googlemail.com
> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:12:44 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] OLSRv1 VS OLSRv2
> To: ***@hotmail.com
> CC: olsr-***@lists.olsr.org
>
> If you compile the OLSRv2 code without the "nl80211-listener" plugin,
> ETT will behave like ETX (because it cannot detect the link speed).
>
> Run "ccmake .." within the build directory and change the variable
> OONF_CUSTOM_STATIC_PLUGINS to the list of plugins you need.
>
> If the variable is empty, you get the following list:
> "cfgparser_compact cfgio_file ff_ett neighbor_probing nl80211_listener
> eth_listener auto_ll4"
>
> You can leave out "neighbor_probing", "nl80211_listener",
> "eth_listener" and "auto_ll4" for your ETX experiment.
>
> Henning Rogge
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Syed Salman Haider Rizvi
> <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All ,
> >
> > I m doing performance evaluation for multi hop ETT vs ETX for ETT i
> > m using using olsrv2 and for etx i m using olsrv1 . because i m not able to
> > use olsrv2 for etx due to plugin compiling problem for my etx . will there
> > be any difference due to different packet of olsr1 vs olsr2 or the packet is
> > same for both versions ???
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > --
> > Olsr-users mailing list
> > Olsr-***@lists.olsr.org
> > https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
>
>
>
> --
> We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered
> long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
> set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan
Loading...